A bitter High Court dispute has broken out concerning possible neighbours above the development of the wall in a coastal web site in a north Dublin suburb, a circumstance which has attracted nationwide notice subsequent an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed loved ones household at Sutton Strand, where allegations of organizing breaches, environmental problems, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Instances report about René Collier as well as Irish Times post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved right into a highly publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design is effective at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a corporation director respectively, request to develop their relatives household. The case is now emblematic of wider disputes together Ireland’s coastline, exactly where development pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of founded inhabitants. According to the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining produced by their potential neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted under arranging authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each people of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their preparing authorization by building a wall outside of the boundaries of their web-site, leading to an encroachment over a Special Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result areas are matter to strict controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, specifically in a very delicate coastal surroundings for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They're in breach in their arranging authorization, and say the wall, that is partially created, is in the right posture. Their lawful team has characterised the action as an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful advancement. The few accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding in order to preserve their see, an allegation that has been repeated in court and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal setting up disputes, wherever sights of the sea are equally hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable initiatives from the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, according to sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-substantial water for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Occasions, a picture that has considering the fact that come to be emblematic of the depth on the dispute. These actions were not merely symbolic; they were being intended to gather visual evidence from the wall’s situation relative to tidal strains and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location through the sea Irish Times described, describing how the two Adult men entered the drinking water for the duration of serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm water to photograph the website turned Probably the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Periods post about accountant Paul Feely observed that this kind of actions ended up cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was staying encroached upon.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 have been protected intimately through the national push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Moments 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as visitors sought to comprehend the qualifications and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court listened to even further submissions on whether or not interim orders needs to be granted to halt development pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important minute during the lawful timeline.
With the core in Rene Collier waded through waist-high water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times the dispute is often a disagreement more than boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve which the wall, as constructed, goes past what was authorized and intrudes into protected land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, has been referred to as meticulous in his examination of scheduling paperwork, maps, and situations connected on the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally pressured that their action is enthusiastic by concern for environmental protection and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving a private perspective, insisting rather that it's about making sure that improvement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological limits. In affidavits, they may have described their extensive-standing link to the area and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a couple only wanting to develop a family house in accordance With all the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Exclusive Area of Conservation and say that each one will work happen to be completed based upon professional suggestions and accredited designs. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include moving into The ocean during a storm, don't change the underlying details.
The case has also lifted broader questions on how preparing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute more than construction of wall at coastal website is now a shorthand description to get a scenario that a lot of observers see as more and more typical. As sea ranges increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation amongst private land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming extra contentious.
The Irish Periods report about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Formerly been linked to community advocacy on arranging and environmental concerns, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from really different Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this sort of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website with the sea Irish Occasions protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of midsection-large drinking water throughout a storm to photograph the website Irish Instances and René Collier waded as a result of waist-large drinking water during a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods are phrases that appeared consistently in coverage, reflecting each the Bodily fact with the coastline and the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings go on, the result continues to be unsure. The court docket ought to identify whether or not the wall as crafted complies with scheduling authorization and whether any encroachment right into a Exclusive Place of Conservation has occurred. The legal arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and scheduling disorders. Nonetheless the human aspect stays central: neighbours who should live together with each other lengthy once the authorized expenses have been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of construction is effective at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, but the implications of the case extend outside of that address. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. In addition, it underscores how immediately a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential concerns such as environmental safety and assets rights are perceived to get at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a spot of purely natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre from the dispute stands partially designed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Irrespective of whether it's going to in the long run be altered, eradicated, or finished as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will most likely keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to One of the more intently viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.